Republican Meteorologist to Mitt Romney:
How You Can Help Me and My Family
My Top Ten Reasons for Republicans to Accept Reality on the Climate
By Guest Blogger Paul Douglas | Sep 10, 2012 | Comments (19)
During the Republican National Convention in Tampa, climate change became a punch line. “President Obama promised to begin to slow the rise of the oceans and heal the planet” Mitt Romney said.
(Pause for polite laughter)
“My promise is to help you and your family.”
![]() |
|
Meteorologist Paul Douglas |
All well and good. But denying climate change won’t help any American family or our fledgling economy. And looking at the world with carbon-colored glasses, or using Solyndra as an excuse to snub renewables and clean-tech, is not only short-sighted, but makes America less competitive on the world stage. According to the World Economic Forum, America’s global competitiveness fell from 1st to 7th place since 2007. Should we just accept that most breakthrough energy technologies are originating in China and Europe, where there is no more “debate” about climate trends? Why is America still questioning the science? For political entertainment? Something tells me Mother Nature may get the last laugh.
To be fair, Romney later adjusted his position on climate change. “My best assessment of the data is that the world is getting warmer, that human activity contributes to that warming,” he said last week in an online debate with president Obama at ScienceDebate.org, “and that policymakers should therefore consider the risk of negative consequences.” Bravo! That’s leadership. But then sadly, in the very next sentence he veered into denial when he said “there remains a lack of scientific consensus on the issue.” This is simply not true, and a candidate for president needs to be dealing in reality on an issue like this. Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree. That’s a consensus.
If it’s not raining, why are we getting wet?
As a Republican business owner, entrepreneur, meteorologist and father of two upbeat, optimistic boys, I may not fit the stereotype of a “global warming alarmist.” I’m an Evangelical Christian. I’m enthusiastic about streamlining government and letting the markets work. But unlike some, I see no inherent struggle between my faith and the ability of science to improve our understanding of the world. The Creator gave me a brain, to think and reason, and react to facts on the ground. And I’m disillusioned, because some in my party are pro-science-denial, and on the wrong side of history.
The word “conservative” no longer applies to the environment. The GOP’s new energy platform shows this, in a stunning departure from 2008. Don’t get me wrong. My party’s focus on the economy and putting Americans back to work is dead on. And America has been blessed with a rich supply of natural resources and innovative technologies to wean ourselves off foreign crude. But our fossil fuel frenzy is impacting the weather floating above our heads. Denying that it’s raining doesn’t keep you from getting wet, and climate change has gone from theory to reality - while our side fiddles away like Nero.
What the data tells me

CEI. Climate Extreme Index. 46% of the USA experienced extremes in temperature and moisture (floods and droughts in 2012, breaking the old record in 1934. Source: NOAA NCDC.
If any climate change skeptic had spent the year I have watching the weather maps - I’m confident they would be saying the same thing. These maps passed “normal” a long time ago. 2012 is the most severe year in recorded history; 46% of the USA has experienced extremes in moisture, drought, temperatures and tropical cyclones, breaking the old record set at the height of the Dust Bowl in 1934. This has been The Year of All or Nothing: drought or flood. And jaw-dropping weather is accomplishing what climate scientists couldn’t quite pull off: convincing a majority of reasonable, logical, God-fearing Americans that something is up. Something has changed.
I make predictions every day, and based on the data I’m seeing here’s my long-range prognosis. What we just experienced was not an aberration. It’s a conservative example (most climate scientists have been, if anything, extremely conservative in their projections) of what’s to come. Sizzling summers will become the norm in the years ahead. We may soon look back on 2012 with fondness for its mild weather. We’ve experienced 7 times more record highs than record lows in 2012; expect that lop-sided ratio to continue. Meteorologists will be spending more precious airtime tracking brushfires — when they’re not warning of impending floods. Nights will trend warmer and fewer subzero outbreaks will reach the continental US, a big silver lining for many. But both Greenland and the Arctic are melting faster than computer models predicted, with the Arctic shattering the old record set in 2007. Scientists were once predicting it would be ice-free in 2080 or 2090. Considering this acceleration we’re seeing, they’re now saying it could be as early at 2030, and some have even said 2015. You heard right. More water absorbing sunlight and less ice reflecting sunlight is accelerating a feedback effect, speeding the warming we’re already witnessing, worldwide.
A two-headed frog still might be a prince
On Earth Day I wrote a story for a blog post in Minnesota. The Huffington Post picked it up. A Republican concerned about climate change? Rare as a two-headed frog. And I can tell you, I got plenty of negative mail from conservatives. But here’s the thing: this isn’t a popularity contest. There’s too much on the line. Some in the GOP mock climate science, but most voters under the age of 30 take the subject very seriously. Dismissing it out of hand is not only disingenuous, but politically short-sighted, and is a failure to care for our children as our parents cared for us. Your kids are following this issue closely. They vote.
“The weather has always been extreme. Why is this any different?” There’s no denying the trends. Actions have consequences. Releasing 90 trillion tons of greenhouse gas, 90 trillion hot air balloons of CO2 and methane in just the last 50 years, is spiking our weather extremes like never before. So rather than focus on the green skin of the messenger, put your ear up to hear what he’s saying.
Paul Douglas’s Top Ten Reasons to Accept Reality on the Climate
Here’s my Top Ten Reasons Why This Isn’t Business as Usual for the Climate – things that convince me — and should convince you too.
10). Shifting Weather Patterns – The jet stream is shifting north over time. I’m seeing things on the weather maps every other day that can’t be explained away as “normal extremes”.
9). Rising Sea Levels – whatever your skeptical uncle Joe says, seas are warming, and as they warm, they expand and sea level goes up. Most scientists predict 3-4 feet in the next 80 years or so. Think twice about buying that retirement condo right on the beach. Find something 4 blocks inland, and be patient.
8). Warmer, More Acidic Oceans – if you scuba dive, you’ve probably noticed that corals reefs aren’t what they used to be. That’s ocean acidification from absorbing carbon dioxide. It’s radically changing the ocean ecosystems and fisheries right now.
7). Straining Water Resources – water for drinking, “fracking”, farming, ethanol production, soda pop, or energy generation – whatever your flavor, it’s getting scarcer. That affects all of the above.
6). Dying Forests – not just by massive, historic wildfires, but by pests like the pine beetle that no longer gets killed off in the warmer winters, turning entire rocky mountains brown with dead pine trees.
5). Extreme Rains and More Severe Local Storms. 4-5% increase in atmospheric moisture – warmer air holds more moisture. That means it gets drier on the ground because more is absorbed by the atmosphere. But it also means when it rains, it rains harder as that higher water content rains out. But dry soil and heavy rains equal floods, and that means more damage and more water lost to runoff.
4). Spike in Wildfires – less water plus pine beetles and other crawly critters that kill trees plus drier soil means more wildfires.
3). More Drought — more water in the atmosphere means less on earth and thus more drought.
2). Superheated summers — the above combine to create hot, hot, hot summers. Drier air is hotter without water to moderate it. Hotter air absorbs even more, even quicker. And hotter air means more air conditioners, means more carbon going back into the atmosphere.
And the number one reason:
Arctic Sea Ice Monitor. The latest value: 3,593,750 square kilometers on September 9, 2012. A new record minimum of Arctic sea ice extent was set on August 24, 2012. The four lowest values of Arctic sea ice have been observed since 2007. Source: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Earth Observation Research Center.
1). Record Arctic Ice Loss. As I said, less ice reflecting means more water absorbing. We used to say the Arctic might be ice free by the middle of the century. Now scientists are saying it may happen as early as 2015. That’s in three years, people. The ice is melting this year at an unprecedented rate, and if we have another warm winter, it won’t be replenished. This could tip the scales for a lot of larger climate changes to come. A comprehensive article in the Wall Street Journal on September 7 summarized “…the six lowest Arctic sea ice levels on record all occurred in the past six years.”
How Mitt Romney can really help you and your family
With the problems facing America today, from record deficits to stubborn unemployment to Iran and The Bomb, why fixate on climate change? Because this will impact all our families; your kids and mine, as well as America’s competitive footing in the 21st century. If Mitt Romney is genuine about his promise to “help you and your family,” he needs to acknowledge this, and work for a solution that will solve both the economic and the climate crisis. He needs to help America to innovate our way into a new energy paradigm, one that will fuel growth, add jobs, and launch new companies focused on cleaner, more sustainable American energy sources.
Will the GOP rise to the occasion, or bet the farm on carbon, and ask our grandkids to deal with the mess? It’s time for bold leadership. Climate change is a threat, but it is also an opportunity to transition to a cleaner, greener, more sustainable economy. American Exceptionalism shouldn’t stop when it comes to innovating new energy sources. We have the technology and entrepreneurial DNA to mitigate climate change, foster innovative, job-producing clean energy technologies, and reinvent America’s economy. Let’s put it to work, Governor Romney. As one prominent supporter said at the convention: “Go ahead, make my day!”
Paul Douglas is Founder and President of The Media Logic Group. His company provides weather data, graphics and mobile API’s via Ham Weather, advanced forecasts for renewable energy companies with Smart Energy, automated severe storm alerts and daily briefings with Alerts Broadcaster, and daily video forecasts for new and legacy media from Broadcast Weather. Broadcast Weather is providing content for WeatherNation TV, a 24/7 linear channel on multiple platforms dedicated to meteorology and storm coverage across the USA. Minnesota’s first Certified Broadcast Meteorologist, Douglas writes a daily print and online column for the Star Tribune.
Tags: Anticience, Climate Change, Economics, Politics, Republican, Environment


Comments (19)
Windy:
Sep 10, 2012 at 04:04 PM
Obama has abandoned global warming and has just pulled the rug out from under the UN climate process by introducing new language that backs away from CO2 target commitments. His speeches are in conflict with his actions. Paul are you critical of Obama's lack of action on climate and if so why aren't you speaking out? Obama is proudly taking credit for supporting fossil fuel/natural gas initiatives which have lowered USA CO2 by 14% since 2005 and I'm pretty sure Romney would support these efforts too. I don't see much difference between Obama and Romney do you?
Eli Rabett:
Sep 10, 2012 at 05:45 PM
Well, yeah, how about the CO2 limits imposed by the EPA, new mileage requirements for cars and trucks and more. Once again, thank you Ralph
Windy:
Sep 10, 2012 at 07:36 PM
Do Rabbets do cost benefit/analysis or do they assume this will be a good policy? Do Rabetts think that the additional costs through the economy (opportunity cost) needed to comply will be an effective/efficient way of spending money on CO2 reduction in the long run? What amount of warming reduction will be acheived from the new CAFE standards? Does Rabbet known?
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/10/us-generalmotors-autos-volt-idUSBRE88904J20120910
Bob Campbell:
Sep 10, 2012 at 04:30 PM
"...or our fledgling economy."?
Guess I need a new dictionary.
FrankieB:
Sep 12, 2012 at 07:12 PM
Leslie, like Paul Ehrlich and his "Population Bomb" nonsense of the 1960's and 1970's ? Oh, how the media loved him....TONIGHT SHOW appearances with Johnny Carson....Walter Cronkite puff-pieces...."60 Minutes".....all of it backed up by 'scientific' studies.
100% nonsense.
I'm surprised Ehrlich isn't behind the global warming baloney. Maybe he was too busy with the Y2K hoax.
FrankieB:
Sep 12, 2012 at 07:10 PM
When someone can explain to me why the Solar System's planets are also warming, let me know. Are they driving SUV's on Neptune and Pluto ?
We also had a 9,000 foot-thick ice sheet covering the Midwest 20,000 years ago. Guess what folks....IT MELTED !! Maybe CO2 levels need to go back to the levels of 21,000 years so we can cover 1/3rd of the United States in ice ???
Global warming my ass...
Jay Alt:
Sep 13, 2012 at 11:22 AM
The other planets are not warming according to scientific measurements of solar irradiance, experts in that field and nasa. Obscure conspiracy blogs say otherwise.
Douglas Price:
Sep 13, 2012 at 11:53 AM
As Jay Alt said, other planets are not warming. Claims to that effect are based on measurement errors from Mars, faulty temperature projections from the outer planets, etc. Total solar irradiance has dropped in recent decades.
As far as the last ice age is concerned, yes, there was an ice sheet over much of North America 20,000 years ago. Ice ages are driven by solar irradiance cycles that are well understood. If not for anthropogenic climate change we would be entering another ice age.
Neal J. King:
Sep 13, 2012 at 01:54 PM
FrankieB:
= Regarding the warming of other planets, please see:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-other-planets-solar-system.htm
= Regarding the ice age some 20,000 years ago: There are natural cycles in climate, specifically the Milankovitch orbital variations. However, we are currently about 40% higher in CO2 than we were 150 years ago, so we could afford to lose quite a bit of that without worrying about the ice ages. The next one isn't due for about 60,000 years.
Rob Dekker:
Sep 17, 2012 at 01:26 AM
Paul,
I hear you. I am a father of 4 amazing kids and I am wondering what kind of world I will be leaving for them when they are my age (2050-2060).
According to the IPCC projections, (the same ones that grossly underestimated Arctic sea ice response) their world will be an average 2 C warmer than what I am living in. The Arctic will likely be at least 2 if not 3 times that temperature increase.
Since Arctic sea ice seems to be MUCH more sensitive than even the most aggressive IPCC models project, and melts out to less than half in a mere 30 years, as well as already causing significant weather changes across the Northern Hemisphere, I am wondering what an additional 45 years of emissions causing an additional 4-6 C increase in Arctic temperatures will accomplish.
And to add insult to Arctic injury, our generation apparently feels that drilling in 99 % of this planet's surface is not enough to satisfy our thirst for oil, and that the 1 % (which was so far covered with sea ice) would easy our current suffering.
Is this generation nuts, or just selfish ?
bill:
Sep 18, 2012 at 11:48 AM
Well yes there was an ice age about 20,000 years ago, hmmm how many people lived through it? So sure bring on the new ice age I'm all fro watching a large portion of the people, plants and animals die off (and yes it could be me and mine as easily as you and yours)
aseqkwnogoz:
Oct 08, 2012 at 07:51 AM
bd3VPW hvghianxrotj, [url=http://sybnejsxicve.com/]sybnejsxicve[/url], [link=http://xsdentumfyuy.com/]xsdentumfyuy[/link], http://rvovdateados.com/
ytegyzgcggb:
Oct 24, 2012 at 04:52 PM
wib6fK prbdlioahcoh, [url=http://tgwegkcsjcnb.com/]tgwegkcsjcnb[/url], [link=http://jkbzujfqnyua.com/]jkbzujfqnyua[/link], http://pkolhbwyvuiq.com/
Pustishka123:
Dec 06, 2012 at 01:25 PM
anonymouslyvardenafil hcl http://medhcl.com/
Erectile dysfunction drugs: cialis tadalafil http://tadamed.com/
Order: viagra super active http://visfo.com/
buy drugs only excellent quality: renova http://yourbeautyph.com/
No Precription: amoxil http://medamox.com/
advantageous conditions of purchase: viagra super force http://edviag.com/
quicklykamagra jelly http://kojbox.com/
Buy ED Drugs eriacta http://eriactrx.com/
What is Erectile Dysfunction Drugs?viagra 100 mg http://edwebmed.com/
Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction: tadalafil http://tadamed.com/
Erectile Dysfunction: tadacip http://edmdrx.com/
Pustishka123:
Dec 06, 2012 at 01:26 PM
LOW Prices!: cialis soft http://medgenpro.com/
click and buy: sildenafil citrate http://drugsildenafilbank.com/
Buy ED Drugsviagra 100 mg http://edwebmed.com/
Treatment & Care: tadalafil 20 mg http://modbax.com/
Treatment & Care: synthroid http://synmcg.com/
LOW Prices!: sildenafil citrate http://drugsildenafilbank.com/
buy now: tadalafil 20 mg http://modbax.com/
best price: Crestor 20 mg http://whatiscrestor20mg.com/
click and buy: levitra http://edpillsbox.com/
do not miss the opportunity to buy at a bargain price: levitra jelly http://levoj.com/
Only at the lowest prices: tadalafil reviews http://medtadalafiline.com/
ED drugs: kamagra http://kgrmed.com/
Online Generic Pharmacy: cialis soft http://medgenpro.com/
save time and money: finasteridehttp://promedfavors.com/
tfrlcdb:
Dec 06, 2012 at 09:05 PM
SIu8su szcoonrrajpv, [url=http://qcuackeygioj.com/]qcuackeygioj[/url], [link=http://aogqmwvjdcku.com/]aogqmwvjdcku[/link], http://ptojjzceaqta.com/
owdylfjyhvu:
Dec 24, 2012 at 09:00 PM
MTdBmI hpmaufhcfpph, [url=http://xvzsugromxyd.com/]xvzsugromxyd[/url], [link=http://hstonudfbjko.com/]hstonudfbjko[/link], http://rsmnkdhcuzaj.com/
cjmqub:
Jan 11, 2013 at 02:37 PM
6ItKtK krbxtzeqcuhv, [url=http://vsixofbejtgx.com/]vsixofbejtgx[/url], [link=http://iahupffobfsq.com/]iahupffobfsq[/link], http://guhuafmsxfvz.com/
udgmbu:
Feb 02, 2013 at 11:57 PM
vaWh75 rfnknriqjbbq, [url=http://ftsxfvonlzop.com/]ftsxfvonlzop[/url], [link=http://bmrvsuygccqf.com/]bmrvsuygccqf[/link], http://obgfsfqqqrvx.com/